edx.org
Get leads like Edx — and thousands more
Build targeted lists by tech stack, traffic, and more
EdX: The Ivy League's Trojan Horse
How Harvard's MOOC spin-off built a $142M empire on the back of open education
In 2012, Harvard and MIT didn't just launch an online learning platform—they weaponized prestige. EdX was born from the radical idea that elite education could be democratized, creating a collision between academic tradition and Silicon Valley scale.
"EdX didn't disrupt education—it weaponized its prestige, turning Harvard's brand into a global distribution network."
The Traffic Paradox
Despite ranking #7,440 globally with 6M monthly visits, EdX's traffic composition reveals a critical insight: 60% direct traffic vs. just 29% organic search. This isn't a platform discovered through algorithms—it's a destination built on institutional trust. When learners type 'edx.org' directly, they're not searching for courses; they're seeking validation from Harvard, MIT, and Google. The 21M backlinks aren't just SEO fuel—they're a testament to the platform's authority as the default gateway for elite online credentials.
The Competitive Shadow
EdX's keyword data exposes its existential tension: it ranks for 'Coursera' (2.1M monthly searches) and 'Udemy' (3.7M)—its direct competitors. This isn't just SEO strategy; it's a battle for search intent. EdX isn't just competing for students—it's competing for the very language of online learning. The platform's 1.3 Trustpilot rating (1,336 reviews) suggests a brutal reality: scale often comes at the cost of experience, but the Harvard brand keeps users returning despite friction.
EdX's 728 employees generate $142.7M in revenue—roughly $196K per employee. This efficiency ratio suggests a lean operation built on academic partnerships rather than content creation. The tech stack reveals modernization efforts (Tailwind, Vite, shadcn/ui) layered over legacy infrastructure—a common pattern for platforms scaling technical debt alongside user growth.
- Institutional credibility as a moat: Harvard/MIT brand equity drives 60% direct traffic
- The 'prestige paradox': High-authority backlinks (21M) vs. poor user sentiment (1.3/5 Trustpilot)
- Enterprise pivot: Leadership includes heads of Enterprise Sales (EMEA, APAC), signaling B2B focus
- Search arbitrage: Ranking for competitor keywords while defending 'edx' brand searches
EdX isn't a startup—it's an institution's digital arm
The $142M revenue and 6M monthly visits prove elite education has found its scalable distribution model, but the 1.3/5 rating hints at the tension between prestige and user experience at scale.
What tech stack does Edx use?
How much traffic does Edx get?
Traffic & Engagement
Rankings
Backlinks & Authority
Search Traffic
Top Organic Keywords
Where is Edx's audience located?
Who competes with Edx?
Device Distribution
What keywords does Edx rank for?
5 keywordsHow is Edx's SEO?
Meta Tags
edX | Online Courses, Certificates & Degrees from Leading Institutions
Find the online learning path for you, delivered by world-class institutions like Harvard, Google, Amazon, and more.
Schema Types
What is Edx's revenue?
Who works at Edx?
Loading leads...
What do customers think of Edx?
edX
Categories
Activity & Engagement
Contact Information
Reviews (20)
Excellent experience with edX
Excellent experience with edX, I audited a course and gained a lot of insight, tools and tips from expert lecturers/professors. Would recommend to anyone serious about professional growth and able to dedicate the time and focus to learning on an online platform. Thank you!
Honest Review: Cybersecurity Bootcamp with edX/University of Minnesota
I am currently attending the Cybersecurity Bootcamp offered by edX in partnership with the University of Minnesota. While the program’s curriculum provides a strong foundation in cybersecurity concepts, its execution falls significantly short in key areas such as infrastructure reliability, instructor quality, and responsiveness to feedback. Prestigious Branding, Misaligned Delivery One of the primary reasons I chose this program was the use of the University of Minnesota’s name in its marketing. Like other edX bootcamps, the program leverages the reputation of prestigious universities to attract students. The advertising creates high expectations, giving the impression that these institutions are deeply involved in the program's design and delivery. In reality, the execution feels like it’s outsourced to third-party providers with limited oversight from the university itself. If not for these well-recognized names, I would have honestly chosen Simplilearn’s Cloud Computing Bootcamp, which I’ve attended in the past. Simplilearn consistently delivered organized sessions with smart, professional instructors who ensured a seamless learning experience. Unfortunately, this bootcamp does not live up to the same standards. Virtual Labs: A Frustrating Experience The program relies heavily on virtual labs for hands-on learning, which is critical for mastering cybersecurity skills. However, the lab provider is unreliable, with frequent technical issues that disrupt the learning process. These problems are never properly resolved, with responsibility being shifted around rather than anyone addressing the root causes. For a program of this scope and cost, such a lack of accountability is unacceptable. Feedback Surveys Without Action Students are required to complete feedback surveys after every topic or lesson, and access to subsequent materials depends on completing them. While the surveys are thoughtfully designed and ask relevant and actionable questions, there is no evidence that this feedback is ever reviewed or acted upon. This mandatory process feels like a waste of time and further erodes trust between students and the program administrators. Inconsistent Instructor Quality Instructor quality varies widely in this program. While the primary instructors are generally competent, substitute instructors often lack preparation and access to necessary tools, such as Slack, which is the program’s main communication platform. For example, one substitute instructor rushed through critical topics like Pentesting, Exploitation, and Privilege Escalation, refusing to repeat demonstrations when requested, despite having ample time. Instead, students were directed to review recordings. This dismissive attitude stands in stark contrast to my experience with Simplilearn, where instructors were always prepared, patient, and responsive to student needs. Final Thoughts While the curriculum itself is strong and provides a solid theoretical foundation, the program is undermined by poor execution and unfulfilled promises. Addressing the following issues would greatly improve the experience: Align Advertising with Reality: Be transparent about the university’s involvement and ensure the delivery matches the promises made in the marketing materials. Fix Infrastructure Issues: Partner with a reliable virtual lab provider to ensure seamless hands-on learning. Act on Feedback: Implement and communicate changes based on student surveys to demonstrate accountability. Ensure Instructor Consistency: Train substitute instructors and provide them with the tools and resources necessary to maintain high teaching standards. If I had known how the program would be delivered, I would have chosen a provider like Simplilearn, which has a proven track record of delivering consistent, professional, and well-organized training. While this program has potential, it requires significant improvements to justify the investment.
Robot Development FedericaX 48 is old, 404s, bad lectures
Robot Development FedericaX 48 is over a decade old. Links fail: 404. Latest references are to 2015. It's 2026! Lectures have no diagrams. Slides mentioned aren't provided. Auto-generated transcripts and I struggled with lecturers' speech. Patently nobody's checked material before publication. I'd like to quit and get my $55 back -- or see an updated version.
Effort without results, cannot recommend
I already hold a postgraduate degree and enrolled in an edX MicroMasters in Data Science to deepen my skills. I ran into several issues. The courses move quickly, provide minimal reading material, and introduce advanced mathematical and programming concepts with very little support—often just a 2–5 minute video and a single page of notes. In practice, you end up teaching yourself. For most exercises and assessments, I had to spend significant time finding external resources that actually explained the material. This isn’t necessarily a deal breaker, but it does make the learning curve steep. The deal breakers were different. Assessment is mostly multiple choice, the discussion forums are inactive, and some quiz answers are hard‑coded and no longer match updated public datasets—making correct answers impossible. I only received marks after asking why I kept failing. Eventually, the course expected a level of knowledge that hadn’t been taught, amounting to undeclared prerequisites. I tried another edX course, but lost a full day just trying to install outdated software and unsupported Java versions required for the assignments. While workarounds exist, the platform’s reliance on obsolete tools makes it difficult to complete tasks as instructed.
A terrible terrible organisation that…
A terrible terrible organisation that wrongly took payment one year ago and has ignored pleas to cancel for the past 12 months. What’s the chances they try again ? Beware.
Frequently Asked Questions about Edx
What is Edx's Revenue?
What does Edx do?
How fast is Edx growing?
How do people interact with Edx?
How do people find Edx?
Who uses Edx?
What technologies does Edx use?
Who are Edx's competitors?
What do customers think of Edx?
Export Data
Unlock all exports
Download CSVs, JSONs & full reports
How to contact Edx?
Contact Information
Export edx.org Data
Download the complete tech stack, analytics, leads, and company data for edx.org in JSON or CSV format. Use it for your sales pipeline, competitive analysis, or research.
Raw JSON Data
Click "Show" to view the raw API response data
About edx.org
Find the online learning path for you, delivered by world-class institutions like Harvard, Google, Amazon, and more.
Company Overview
edx.org Social Media
Contact edx.org
Email Addresses
Phone Numbers
Technology Stack
edx.org uses 19 technologies across their website including Font Awesome, reCAPTCHA, Contentful, and more.
Fonts
Font Awesome
Security
reCAPTCHA
CMS
Contentful
Cloud & Hosting
Amazon Web Services, AWS CloudFront
Analytics & Marketing
New Relic, Segment, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Performance
Lazy Loading, Priority Hints
Traffic & Audience
edx.org receives approximately 6.0M monthly visitors and ranks #7,440 globally. The website has a bounce rate of 41% with visitors viewing an average of 6.1 pages per visit. Users spend an average of 5:25 on the site.
The majority of edx.org's traffic comes from undefined, undefined, .
Frequently Asked Questions
What is edx.org?
What technologies does edx.org use?
How do I contact edx.org?
What are edx.org's social media accounts?
Is edx.org hiring?
How popular is edx.org?
Related Searches
This page provides publicly available information about edx.org. Data is collected from various public sources and may not always be up to date. For the most accurate information, please visit edx.org directly at https://edx.org.