Technology Comparison 2026
Astro vs Backbone.js
Data-driven comparison based on 2.6K websites analyzed
65%
35%
Market Share Distribution (3 websites use both)
1.2K
Astro Users
721
Backbone.js Users
3
Use Both
2.6K
Total Market
Head-to-Head Comparison
Market AdoptionAstro wins
Astro1.7K
vs
Backbone.js898
Astro has wider adoption
High-Traffic Sites (100K+)Astro wins
Astro128
vs
Backbone.js93
Astro powers more high-traffic sites
Enterprise Adoption (1000+ employees)Backbone.js wins
Astro45
vs
Backbone.js70
Backbone.js is more popular with enterprises
Startup Adoption (1-49 employees)Astro wins
Astro1.1K
vs
Backbone.js381
Astro is more popular with startups
Average Company SizeBackbone.js wins
Astro189 employees
vs
Backbone.js693 employees
Backbone.js is used by larger companies on average
Astro leads in 3 of 5 categories
Astro
Frontend Frameworks
Websites
1.2K
Avg Traffic
13.8M/mo
Avg Employees
189
Enterprises
45
Top Industries
Tech Services64%
Fintech6%
Biotech5%
Marketing5%
AI4%
Company Size Distribution
64%
23%
StartupSMBMid-MarketEnterprise
Top Countries
🇺🇸 United States 78%🇬🇧 United Kingdom 6%🇮🇳 India 4%🇨🇦 Canada 2%🇫🇷 France 2%
Backbone.js
Frontend Frameworks
Websites
721
Avg Traffic
3.1M/mo
Avg Employees
693
Enterprises
70
Top Industries
Tech Services58%
Marketing6%
Environmental5%
Media5%
NonProfit5%
Company Size Distribution
43%
35%
15%
StartupSMBMid-MarketEnterprise
Top Countries
🇺🇸 United States 81%🇬🇧 United Kingdom 7%🇨🇦 Canada 3%🇫🇷 France 2%🇦🇺 Australia 2%
Companies Using Both Technologies
3 companies use Astro and Backbone.js together
Astro vs Backbone.js - Frequently Asked Questions
Both Astro and Backbone.js are popular choices. Astro is used by 1.2K websites while Backbone.js is used by 721 websites. The best choice depends on your specific requirements, team expertise, and project needs.
Related Comparisons
Compare Any Technology
Search our database of 2.6K+ websites to compare any two technologies